This GOP Member Gets It, Backs Trump and Martial Law

Virginia Commonwealth Senator Amanda Chase has suggested that President Trump “should declare martial law as recommended by General Flynn.” What did she say in context? And what would Martial Law entail? The is where The GOP Times shines, because as Conservative realism teaches us Universal law is for lackeys. Context… is for kings.”

First, Let’s Get The ‘Martial Law’ Quote Straight

Because the mainstream media will not do this (shame on you WVTF, The Virginian Pilot, CNN and Washington Post), here is Senator Chase’s full comment in context.

“Not my President and never will be. The American people aren’t fools.
We know you cheated to win and we’ll never accept these results. Fair elections we can accept but cheating to win; never. It’s not over yet. So thankful President Trump has a backbone and refuses to concede. President Trump should declare martial law as recommended by General Flynn.
Here in Virginia the Democrats legalized cheating at the ballot box to win- all under the guise of covid. The Virginia Democrat Majority repealed voter ID laws, eliminated witness signatures and allowed voters to drop off sacred ballots in unsecured ballot boxes across the state, destroying the integrity and chain of custody of our ballots. In many other states this would be illegal.
So what am I going to do about it? I’m currently working with The Virginia Project and Sidney Powell to expose what I and others believe is extensive fraud here in Virginia. We need attorneys, auditors and anyone willing to help with the cause to reach out. We cannot allow them to get away with this.
To volunteer email Linda at [email protected]
January 6 will be a big day. Keep praying and keep the faith. Support the fight to reclaim Virginia.”

A Deeper Look: Point by Point

There is quite a bit more to that comment that the leftist media is unwilling to unpack. Let’s look at her points with citation and Lt. Gen. Flynn’s actual recommendation.

Lt. General Flynn’s Recommendations

Less ‘Red Dawn’ more Brown v. Board of Education

All of these points are readily researchable in the age of the internet, the stories are out there. This is purely a narrative driven matter that the drive-by media doesn’t want to address. Now let’s get to the heart of the matter: What did Flynn recommend? Full-blown Martial Law? A column of M1 Abrams tanks rolling down the 95? Nope. At most Flynn has called of “Limited Martial Law” and that’s if you go by his retweet of the We The People Convention.


Speaking to Newsmax Flynn said:

“There is no way in the world we are going to be able to move forward as a nation,” General Flynn said. “[The president] could immediately, on his order, seize every single one of these machines.”

“Within the swing states,” he continued, “if he wanted to, he could take military capabilities, and he could place those in states and basically rerun an election in each of those states. “I mean, it’s not unprecedented. These people are out there talking about martial law like it’s something that we’ve never done. Martial law has been instituted 64 times.

He added: ”We have a constitutional process. We clearly have a constitutional process. That has to be followed.”

Flynn’s suggestion is simple; extremely limited and well within the powers of the President. He calls for all voting machines to be secured for investigation, a pause to the electoral process and a full re-vote in swing states under the protection and logistical support of the military.


This is a mission that American forces have undertaken in Japan, South Korea, Iraq and Afghanistan, one they’re extremely skilled at and recognized for internationally. Our military wouldn’t interfere with the electoral process, they would secure and facilitate it. And with the military being one of the few institutions Americans still trust, this makes some sense.



  2. Which Alphabet Agency would the President task with the task of impoundment of the (probably already scrubbed 6 ways from Sunday) servers in question? What if the director of whichever one it might be flatly refused? (And, of course, made it public?) If he tried to use the military w/o declaring at least limited Martial Law (with out which, unless Obama, with[ ‘His’] pen and a phone” nullified it, Posse Comitatus, I believe, precludes him from doing), there’s enough Never Trumper’s in the Pentagon to make that almost impossible. Besides, anyone clever (and determined) enough to program computers to do what has been alleged, is also clever enough to program said servers to delete any such nefarious code and, if necessary, replace it with innocuous instructions instead. Even if it was the military, my guess is whomever was at the site would refuse entry and, in order to not appear overly aggressive, the military would try fruitless, drawn out negotiations, thus give those inside more time to destroy whatever evidence might still be inside. Yes, its a “Minefield” – one that must be crossed to make the Constitution still mean something. Semper Fi

  3. I would back martial law right now, without reservation The SCOTUS has abrogated its duty to hear Texas’ complaint against the six states with wholly inadequate and in my estimation, purposefully corrupt methods of counting, clearing signatures and sedition. They were tols they have no standing. I am a citizen of the US and I have standing and I do not live in one of those corrupt marxist dem controlled states. Those states diluted MY vote by their corrupt running of the election, To me, that is standing and Texas suffered the same dilution of their votes. Either completely throw out those states or rerun the election in them with VERY careful observation of the marxist dems at the polling locations. NO MAIL IN and verifiable ID!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Article

"God Access" Hack Shocking Revelations Released

Next Article
President Trump Announces NEW EVIDENCE

President Trump Announces NEW EVIDENCE

Related Posts