dominion

As evidence mounts to support the claims of mass voter fraud in the 2020 election, officers with Dominion voting software admits to having the ability to manipulate votes.

Dominion Software Leaders Sketchy Actions

The person responsible for the security of Dominion Voting Systems is Dr. Eric Coomer.

He told the Illinois State Board of Elections in 2016 that there are ways to bypass election systems software.

The Post Email reports on this:

Dr. Coomer’s statement brings to light a very serious issue all voters should understand. Voting systems must be re-certified each time they make changes to the hardware or software. Recertification is an expensive and time-consuming process. What Dr. Coomer told the Board is that Dominion Voting does not go back for recertification of software when threats to their code are discovered. Rather, they rely on post-election audits and providing advice to election jurisdictions about security. I have reviewed all of the recertification documents produced by Dominion, and I do not recall any software adjustments for security purposes.

This is the reality of the security of your vote. Software systems that count and record the vote across Illinois and throughout the USA are not updated to address security problems, and even if they were, the software can be completely bypassed by going to the data tables that drive the systems.

Video Evidence

Here is a video of Coomer discussing the voting software:

Censorship on Those Trying to Expose Corruption

A man named Joe Oltmann ousted Coomer as a huge hater of Donald Trump. His Twitter page was suspended after tweeting out evidence that Coomer is an Antifa member who hates the president.

This is a FB post from Dr. Eric Coomer. This is the Antifa “manifesto” letter to Trump. This is the man that is responsible for the strategy and Security of Dominion Voting Systems. I will post all of the posts here over the next couple of days. Share and follow pic.twitter.com/E2rK9TznVw

— Joe Oltmann (@JoeOltmann) November 12, 2020

6 Comments

  1. So knowing the way they can fix the votes with voter fraud they still did nothing to fix that . Then they put people in charge who hate the president and try to say everything is done the right way ??? Do I have stupid write across my far head ??? Do they really expect us to just say it’s ok , perverted old joe won ??? Knowing he still has to face the fact he’s going to jail for the corruption of his and his sons dirty deeds . Maybe he can get the cell next to Obama the traitor for his part in spying on trump and giving billons to our enemies . I just wonder what secrets he gave away to the Muslims in Iran and else where . If he gave money like that why not our secrets too ??? After all he’s a traitor to the country

  2. So, the software can be changed to give whatever answer the person who changes it wants. Thank God the Democrats don’t have anybody who might want to take advantage of that, because, you know…Trump might get screwed if they did. Oh, wait-he did get screwed. Never mind. I’ve read that Texas refused the software because of security problems it contained, and yet other states all over the country found nothing wrong with it. It seems to me that the ability to alter results by tweeking the software is a pretty significant fault if election integrity is your goal. I find it more than a little interesting that several of the users refused to allow experts to check the settings on the counters.

Leave a reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here