According to John Santucci of ABC News, Attorney Sidney Powell was spotted at the White House, possibly meeting to discuss a new executive order “that White House aides thought had been quashed”.
Sidney Powell was reportedly seen leaving the White House just before 9 p.m., but denied that she had met with President Trump after being questioned by reporters.
According to CNN White House correspondent Jeremy Diamond, when questioned about meeting with the president, Powell said: “It would be none of your business.”
ABC’s John Santucci shared Diamond’s tweet, commenting that: “@ABC has confirmed Sidney Powell was indeed meeting with President Trump tonight in the White House residence pushing for an executive order that White House aides thought had been quashed after Friday night Oval mtg. Unclear what the President may or may not do…”
Clarification – sources say it is unclear if Powell had face time with Trump tonight but was in the building pitching EO
— John Santucci (@Santucci) December 21, 2020
Santucci later clarified his remarks, writing: “Clarification – sources say it is unclear if Powell had face time with Trump tonight but was in the building pitching EO.”
The Possible Executive Order
Sources say that the executive order Sidney Powell is discussing with President Trump will order voting machines to be seized for inspection.
Powell, President Trump, and other conservatives have alleged that these voting machines contained built-in errors designed to change the outcome of the election. According to a recent audit of Dominion voting machines in Antrim County, they may be correct.
The audit report concluded: “The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots. We observed an error rate of 68.05 percent. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity.”
“These errors resulted in overall tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication. This high error rates proves the Dominion Voting System is flawed and does not meet state or federal election laws. Because the intentional high error rate generates large numbers of ballots to be adjudicated by election personnel, we must deduce that bulk adjudication occurred. However, because files and adjudication logs are missing, we have not yet determined where the bulk adjudication occurred or who was responsible for it. Our research continues,” the report continues.
If similar errors are found in voting machines in other counties, the Trump campaign may be able to prove widespread fraud in the election.