A judge has allowed the release of a report that may restore conservatives’ faith in President Trump’s election victory, revealing information about fraud in the Antrim County, Michigan election that could indicate widespread fraud by Dominion Voting Systems software.
Antrim County has been in the news multiple times since Election Day, most notably for a news story that broke right after the election in which 6,000 votes were switched from President Trump and Republican Senate candidate John James, to Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden and Democrat Senator Gary Peters. The switch was originally reported as a “software glitch,” but Democrats have since tried to claim it was just human error. This new report may prove that claim false.
Multiple serious anomalies were found in the forensic audit, which was conducted by Allied Security Operations Group, a notable company which employs many former Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, and Central Intelligence Agency officials.
More than 1,400 votes were found to have been changed after the company examined a Dominion ImageCast Precinct machine for possible hardware problems.
“This is the most preliminary report of serious election fraud indicators. In comparing the numbers on both rolls, we estimate 1,474 votes changed across the two rolls, between the first and the second time the exact same ballots were run through the County Clerk’s vote counting machine—which is almost the same number of voters that voted in total,” Allied Security Operations Group said after evaluating two tape rolls in Central Lake Township.
The audit found that “742 votes were added to School Board Member for Central Lake Schools,” and “657 votes were removed from School Board Member for Ellsworth Schools.”
“There were incremental changes throughout the rolls with some significant adjustments between the 2 rolls that were reviewed. This demonstrates conclusively that votes can be and were changed during the second machine count after the software update. That should be impossible especially at such a high percentage to total votes cast,” the company wrote.
“For the School Board Member for Central Lake Schools, there were 742 votes added to this vote total. Since multiple people were elected, this did not change the result of both candidates being elected, but one does see a change in who had most votes. If it were a single-person election this would have changed the outcome and demonstrates conclusively that votes can be and were changed during the second machine counting. That should be impossible,” Allied Security Operations Group said.
After analyzing the results of the election for School Board Member for Ellsworth Schools, the company said that 657 votes were “removed from this election,” adding, “In this case, only 3 people who were eligible to vote actually voted. Since there were 2 votes allowed for each voter to cast,” the recount “correctly shows 6 votes.”
Two images were included in the report from the “School Board Member for Ellsworth Schools” vote totals from Election Day, and the November 6 Michigan recount. On the night of the election, 663 total votes were recorded, while the recount showed only six total votes.
The audit was conducted on behalf of plaintiff William Bailey. Judge Kevin Elsenheimer allowed the public release of the report on Monday.
The forensic audit also found that logs from the 2020 election are missing.
“Significantly, the computer system shows vote adjudication logs for prior years; but all adjudication log entries for the 2020 election cycle are missing. The adjudication process is the simplest way to manually manipulate votes. The lack of records prevents any form of audit accountability, and their conspicuous absence is extremely suspicious since the files exist for previous years using the same software,” the report states.
“We must conclude that the 2020 election cycle records have been manually removed,” the report continues.
The fact that these logs are “missing” is concerning, because the audit also revealed that the voting machines rejected a significant number of ballots for adjudication, a manual process in which election workers examine each ballot and determine its outcome.
“The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots. We observed an error rate of 68.05 percent. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity,” the report reads.
“These errors resulted in overall tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication. This high error rates proves the Dominion Voting System is flawed and does not meet state or federal election laws. Because the intentional high error rate generates large numbers of ballots to be adjudicated by election personnel, we must deduce that bulk adjudication occurred. However, because files and adjudication logs are missing, we have not yet determined where the bulk adjudication occurred or who was responsible for it. Our research continues,” the report continues.
Russell Ramsland, who manages the Allied Security Operations Group, authored the report. Ramsland has an MBA from Harvard University and a political science degree from Duke University, and has worked at both NASA and MIT.