An Illinois judge, Michael McHaney, stood on the side of Americans’ constitutional rights on Thursday by voiding Democrat Governor J.B. Pritzker’s coronavirus lockdown orders.
Dems Keep Stripping Freedom from Citizens
Since early March, Pritzker has kept his statewide disaster declaration continuing for months. Once a 30-day extension of the pervasive order expires, the governor has continued to add more extensions.
In April, Rep. Darren Bailey attempted to take a restraining order against the Democrat governor, which Pritzker then appealed. The Illinois Supreme Court decided not to intervene in the matter. At this point, Rep. Bailey withdrew the original order and refiled a new lawsuit to include all residents and businesses, the Gateway Pundit reported.
Bailey and Pritzker have butted heads and the Rep. was even made to leave the House floor after a vote during the General Assembly’s special session in violation of a rule mandating lawmakers wear masks, according to the Chicago Tribune.
Judge Gives Win to Liberty
This past Thursday, Judge McHaney ruled that current state law does not provide governors the authority to extend disaster proclamations past 30 days through an executive order.
“This is a victory for freedom. This is a victory for the people of Illinois,” Bailey said.
Illinois is Open!
— Darren Bailey (@DarrenBaileyIL) July 2, 2020
“Every other court — both state and federal — that has considered these exact issues has agreed with the administration that executive orders protecting Illinoisans’ health and safety are well within the governor’s constitutional authority,” the governor’s spokesperson Emily Bittner said. “This includes a federal court decision earlier today.”
The lawsuit was also backed by the state Republican Party and three local GOP organizations that agree that the governor’s executive order limiting the size of gatherings violates First and 14th Amendment rights.
Dem Judge Halts Freedom Progress
A U.S. District Judge Sara Ellis put a block on Republican’s request to challenge Pritzker’s orders on gathering limits.
“Plaintiffs ask that they be allowed to gather — without limitation — despite the advice of medical experts and the current rise in infections,” Ellis wrote. “The risks in doing so are too great.”
“Political parties are for political expression what churches are for religious expression: the corporate manifestation of speech and interaction within a community of shared belief,” the lawsuit state. “Political parties’ events and rallies are also like protest rallies and marches. And like churches and marches, political parties operate in a world where time matters; the 2020 election is only months away.”
“The Constitution does not accord a political party the same express protections as it provides to religion,” Ellis rebutted. “Allowing Plaintiffs to gather would open the floodgates to challenges from other groups that find in-person gatherings most effective. It would also require that the Court turn a blind eye to the increase in infections across a high majority of states, which as of July 1, 2020 includes Illinois.”
Coronavirus Restrictions Still Need to be Rebutted
As freedoms continue to be stripped from American citizens through Democrat governors’ executive orders, there are those like Judge Michael McHaney and Rep. Darren Bailey who are fighting back.