Stacey Abrams Ends Up Being an Albatross for Democrats

Ever since Georgia Democrat Stacey Abrams stated in December 2021 that she was running for reelection election in the state’s 2022 gubernatorial race, she has actually been dogged by critics and even some in the mainstream media over her consistent claims that the 2018 race between her and Republican Brian Kemp was “stolen.”

The reaction from the Abrams campaign, her supporters on the left and others in the MSM has actually been efforts at either completely modifying her history of claims that the system was “rigged” versus her by Kemp, who was secretary of state at the time, or to simply neglect them as though she ‘d never made the claim.

When inquired about it during a current CNBC interview, Abrams went the gaslighting route, stating that “What I’ve always talked to is the ability of voters to cast their ballots and have their ballots counted. There is not a single politician, including myself, who is entitled to win an election, and that was never my point” (which was a lie).

But in an interview she gave Monday to Axios media outlet, Abrams made a statement concerning questioning election results that will trigger more headaches for Democrats heading into the 2022 midterms.

“I do not ever want us to be in a place as Americans where we can not legitimately question and critique systems and try to make them better,” Abrams told them prior to proceeding with playing word video games in trying to distinguish her claims of a “stolen” election from previous President Trump’s:

“What Trump has done is invalidate systems because he didn’t like the individual impact,” she stated. “And he’s provided no information or proof of his accusations.”

“I ought to be held liable for everything I state, have the ability to tie it to evidentiary facts. Which’s what I have actually been doing. And that’s what I’ll continue to do.”

The huge issue here is that Abrams herself hasn’t offered any “info or evidence” of her own allegations. In fact, as the Axios piece even kept in mind, a federal judge tossed out “most of Fair Battle’s [Abrams’ PAC] original complaints,” with her suit against the state, which will be heard in April, now “narrowly focused.”

Even more, Abrams is splitting hairs here in trying to make differences in between what she did post-2018 election and what Trump did post-2020 election. In terms of the overall “message” Democrats and the media have tried to send out about questioning election results over the last year, it’s a distinction without a distinction.

That “message,” in a nutshell, has actually been that questioning election outcomes in and of itself no matter whether or not you take legal action amounts the “Big Lie” and makes you an insurrection-y type of person (except when your name is Stacey Abrams or Hillary Clinton). It’s not real, because there have actually certainly been times in our country’s electoral history where election outcomes were doubtful (which is why there are laws on the books about the legal process involved in raising the issue in a law court about them).

However due to the fact that Dems and their co-conspirators in the press have such a politically beneficial interest in perpetuating this incorrect narrative entering into the 2022 midterms and into the 2024 governmental election race, they need to keep hope alive out there that there will be enough people who are still annoyed sufficient about the Capitol riot to vote versus Republicans to the point it might give Dems an advantage at the tally box.

That said, beyond diehard Democrats and Never ever Trump grifters, many people in this country have carried on from what took place on January 6th, 2021. In reality, there are a number of polls out there that program Trump besting Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and Hillary Clinton should he run once again in 2024, which informs you that the Democrat harping on the so-called “Trump-inspired insurrection” has actually not simply failed; it’s been nuked into the ground.

And going even beyond that, Abrams saying “I don’t ever desire us to be in a place as Americans where we can not legally concern and review systems and try to make them much better” is exactly what many Trump fans have and Trump himself has actually said regarding the questioning of election results. So it’s going to be hard for Democrats to square Abrams’ irregular and fumbling rhetoric on this subject with their own broader talking points about how it’s always wrong to do so (unless you happen to be a Democrat or Democrat super-lawyer).

The funny thing here is that it’s obvious Abrams thinks she’s making a strong case for reducing the claims versus her (and Democrats) that she and they are hypocrites. Other than she’s not, and as the Georgia gubernatorial election gets better, anticipate more in the “Huge Lie”-driven media to do the significant lifting for Abrams in order to attempt and liberate her and her party from the twisted “Big Lie” web of their own making.

Need to be fun to see the pretzel reasoning included. We’ll ensure to keep you published.

Flashback– >> Analysis: Joe Biden Outs Himself as Huge ‘Huge Lie’ Hypocrite Ahead of 2022 Midterms

Source

Sponsored
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Article

Ukrainian Member of Parliament Does Not Hold Back About Biden's SOTU Address

Next Article

Kamala Sweeps the Leg out of Under One of Biden's Greatest Lies

Related Posts