Breaking: Military Documents that Contradict Fauci’s SWORN Testimony

January 12, 2022

There are a few moments in history when a story breaks that is so consequential and that will stoke such immediate and righteous rage as the reader should be adequately warned prior to reading it. So make no mistake, this isn’t a trigger warning, because it is not intended to discourage the weak-minded or poorly constituted from reading what follows. This is simply the advice of the writer to brace yourself for what is about to come. For we were all… every one of us…deceived. Military documents from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency have been released and confirmed that not only contradict Dr. Anthony Fauci’s sworn testimony before Congress but that utterly shatters the entire COVID19 narrative.

‘It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled’ –Mark Twain.

Project Veritas, in a release that at any other time would all-but annihilate any remaining trust in the Federal Government set out the case that:

“Military documents state that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018 seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat borne coronaviruses. The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violates the gain of function research moratorium.
The main report regarding the EcoHealth Alliance proposal leaked on the internet a couple of months ago, it has remained unverified until now. Project Veritas has obtained a separate report to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, written by U.S. Marine Corp Major, Joseph Murphy, a former DARPA Fellow.
“The proposal does not mention or assess potential risks of Gain of Function (GoF) research,” a direct quote from the DARPA rejection letter.
Project Veritas reached out to DARPA for comment regarding the hidden documents and spoke with the Chief of Communications, Jared Adams, who said, “It doesn’t sound normal to me,” when asked about the way the documents were buried.”

The Military Documents That Shatter The COVID19 Narrative

The summary doesn’t even begin to tell the story, Veritas obtained from their sources documents that have never been released before that layout in sickening detail the origins of COVID19, from the research project that proposed it, the gain of function research that birthed it, the vaccines that were developed with suspicious speed, the potential treatments through ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine that were deliberately and purposefully suppressed… all of it… laid out in catastrophic detail.

“The documents in question stem from a report at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, better known as DARPA, which were hidden in a top secret shared drive.”

This initial document was leaked online months ago but remained unconfirmed, until now. Project Veritas managed to get their hands on a separate but related report that was written to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense by United States Marine Corps Major, Joseph Murphy, a former fellow at DARPA. The report that James O’Keefe and his team obtained stated that the EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in early 2018 and sought military funding for what they called “Project DEFUSE” with the goal of conducting Gain of Function (GoF) research on coronaviruses in China derived from bats. Sound familiar?

The proposal was outright rejected by DARPA who wrote, “The DEFUSE proposed project by EHA was rejected by DARPA, although “if funding became available”, certain components of particular interest could have gone ahead, subject to a clear contractual Dual Use Research of Concern (DURC) risk mitigation plan that ‘includes a responsible communications plan’. “

DARPA identified nine major weaknesses in the proposal that drove their decision, some of them are pretty startling, let’s touch on the first five:

“1. The proposal is considered to potentially involve GoF/DURC research because they propose to synthesize spike glycoproteins which bind to human cell receptors and insert them into SARSr-CoV backbones to assess whether they can cause SARS-like disease.
2. However the proposal does not mention or assess potential risks of Gain of Function
(GoF) research.

3. Nor does the proposal mention or assess Dual Use Research of Concern (DURC)
issues, and thus fails to present a DURC risk mitigation plan.
4. The proposal hardly addresses or discusses ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI).
5. The proposal fails to discuss problems with the proposed vaccine delivery systems
caused by the known issues of variability in vaccine dosage.”

In items, one thru three: DARPA establishes unequivocally that contrary to Dr. Fauci’s sworn testimony, this absolutely WAS gain of function and also Dual Use Research of Concern. Thus already breaking the law in the moratorium against Gain of Function research that was in effect at the time. Item four refers to a serious lack of consideration for ” ethical, legal, and social issues”. And fifth and most startlingly an issue that is plaguing vaccination efforts presently is outlined with the chilling sentence “the known issues of variability in vaccine dosage”. One dose, two doses, four doses, boosters, monthly boosters… they knew before the virus was even released that the vaccine dosage would be “variable” and there was no way to predict it. The report concludes disturbingly that,

“It is clear that the proposed DEFUSE project led by Peter Daszak could have put local communities at risk”

Little did they know, the risk would be global. Furthermore, the report goes on to review in detail the serious concerns held by DARPA over the gain of function research in addition to “the concealment of documents, the suppression of potential curatives, like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, and the mRNA vaccines.” according to Project Veritas. During a heated hearing with Senator Rand Paul on January 11th, Dr. Fauci the Director of the NIAID seemed downright rattled and easily perturbed, as he utterly refused to answer reasonable questions from several GOP Senators regarding the project with Peter Daszak, instead preferring to attack Senator Paul, accusing him of inciting threats against his life.